Katie Holmes Walks Away From Her Marriage To Tom Cruise A Very Wealthy Lady

Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes Katie Holmes will walk away from her marriage to Tom Cruise a very wealthy lady. She is being reported to receive $3 million for every year she was married to Tom Cruise.

The 33-year-old actress filed for divorce on Friday (June 29,2012) from the 49-year-old actor who she got married to in November 2006 and as she had signed a per-nuptial agreement before they tied the knot, she is unable to seek half his rumoured $275 million fortune.

Instead, she will reportedly be paid $15 million for the five-year union as well as being given their $35 million Beverly Hills mansion.

However, Katie ,who has cited ”irreconcilable differences” as the reason behind their split is seeking sole custody of the couple’s six-year-old daughter, Suri, and experts believe she will get a huge amount of child support from Tom.

Top divorce attorney Vikki Ziegler told Hollywoodlife.com: ”Most of the estate is Tom’s. She’ll have to go for a lot of child support. She’ll have to show that Suri has nannies, cars, activities, clothes, hair appointments. That a hefty amount each month is needed to maintain Suri’s lifestyle.”

Once the divorce is finalised both Katie and Tom will keep their respective earnings from the projects they’ve worked on since November 2006.

As well as the Beverly Hills mansion, the former couple also have homes in New York, Colorado, Italy and England.
Since they did not stay married for 11 years, the per-nuptial agreement states California community property laws won’t apply to the divorce , which normally sees a couple’s assets split 50/50.

Following the news Katie was filing for divorce, Tom , who has two children, Isabella, 19, and 17-year-old Connor with ex-wife Nicole Kidman said he was ”deeply saddened” by it.

According to TMZ, Katie Holmes is seeking primary custody of her daughter Suri and has requested “a suitable amount” of child support from her husband Tom Cruise in divorce papers filed on Thursday.

  1. nadia Reply

    d lady is greedy she doent diserv dat child she may do d same 2 her daughter so as 4 me notin lke dat u are on urown most parent are loking 4 d oppotunity she has i tink greed is her 1st name.

Leave a Reply